
We report on an evaluation of the effectiveness of considering a user's familiarity with a topic in improving information retrieval performance. This approach to personalization is based on previous results indicating differences in user search behavior and judgments according to his/her familiarity to the topic explored, and to research on using implicit sources of evidence to determine the user's context and preferences. Our attempt was to relate a topic-dependent concept and measure, familiarity with the topic, with topic-independent measures of documents such as readability, concreteness/abstractness, and specificity/generality. Contrary to our expectations, a user’s familiarity with a topic has no effect on the utility of readability or concrete/abstract scoring. We are encouraged, however, to find that high readability had a positive effect on search results, regardless of a user’s familiarity with a topic.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
