
Blindfolded participants felt pairs of “rivalrous” stimuli simultaneously, one with each index finger. The stimuli presented at each fingertip were 180° rotations of each other (e.g. <and>). Participants moved one index finger which caused a raised line to move underneath the other, stationary, index finger, in a yoked manner. Thus, when a <was traced with the moving finger it caused a> to be felt at the stationary finger. On all trials there was a raised line moving underneath the stationary finger. For the moving finger, a raised line was present on only one-third of the trials. When a raised line could be felt at the moving fingertip, the angle followed by this finger was invariably reported in conjunction with the angle present at the other (stationary) fingertip. However, when no line was present under the moving finger (i.e. when movement became the major cue for shape), participants almost always reported experiencing only the angle presented to the stationary fingertip - capturing the angle followed by the moving finger. Results are interpreted in light of optimal integration, bistable figures and inattentional blindness.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
