
AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) has been widely used in a domain of decision making, and there are a lot of extensions using fuzzy measure and integrals. In the previous research, we propose a kind of sensitivity analyses for AHP or fuzzy measure AHP, because it often occurs that data of AHP loses its reliability. In other words a comparison matrix there in does not always have enough consistency. Also in these cases, the authors propose one representation for weights using results from the sensitivity analysis. In this paper we refine fuzzy weights representation for fuzzy measure AHP. It can show how results of (fuzzy) AHP have fuzziness when the comparison matrix does not have relatively good consistency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
