
It is well known that relational theory carries very little semantic. To mine deeper semantics, additional modeling is necessary. In fact, some "pure" association rules are found to exist even in randomly generated data. We consider a relational database in which every attribute value has some additional information, such as price, fuzzy degree, neighborhood, or security compartment and levels. Two types of additions are considered: one is structure added, the other is valued-added. Somewhat a surprise, the additional cost in semantics checking is found to be very well compensated by the pruning of non-semantic rules.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
