
handle: 2158/599010
A comprehensive classification of failures in computing systems is discussed. The underlying guidelines are: (1) a failure classification must be independent of any particular system; that is, it should be able to be applied to every system; (2) a failure classification must be as detailed as possible; (3) treatment of failures following detection and other parameters, such as the severity of failures, are to be considered as a second step, since they may require a defined categorization. The main advantage of the failure classification is the possibility of characterizing systems with respect to their failure modes, providing designers with a way to choose the most appropriate detection techniques for each particular system. >
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
