
This paper examines various activity estimation techniques in order to determine which are most appropriate for use in the context of field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Specifically, the paper compares how different activity estimation techniques affect the accuracy of FPGA power models and the ability of power-aware FPGA CAD tools to minimize power. After comparing various existing techniques, the most suitable existing techniques are combined with two novel enhancements to create a new activity estimation tool called ACE-2.0. Finally, the new publicly available tool is compared to existing tools to validate the improvements. Using activities estimated by ACE-2.0, the power estimates and power savings were both within 1% of the results obtained using simulated activities.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
