
doi: 10.1109/focs.2006.56
We investigate the optimality of (1+\in )-approximation algorithms obtained via the dimensionality reduction method. We show that: --Any data structure for the (1+\in )-approximate nearest neighbor problem in Hamming space, which uses constant number of probes to answer each query, must use n^{\Omega \left( {1/ \in ^2 } \right)} space. --Any algorithm for the (1+\in )-approximate closest substring problem must run in time exponential in 1/ \in ^{2 - \gamma } for any \gamma > 0 (unless 3SAT can be solved in subexponential time) Both lower bounds are (essentially) tight.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
