
arXiv: 1701.05921
Previous work in the area of gesture production, has made the assumption that machines can replicate "human-like" gestures by connecting a bounded set of salient points in the motion trajectory. Those inflection points were hypothesized to also display cognitive saliency. The purpose of this paper is to validate that claim using electroencephalography (EEG). That is, this paper attempts to find neural signatures of gestures (also referred as placeholders) in human cognition, which facilitate the understanding, learning and repetition of gestures. Further, it is discussed whether there is a direct mapping between the placeholders and kinematic salient points in the gesture trajectories. These are expressed as relationships between inflection points in the gestures' trajectories with oscillatory mu rhythms (8-12 Hz) in the EEG. This is achieved by correlating fluctuations in mu power during gesture observation with salient motion points found for each gesture. Peaks in the EEG signal at central electrodes (motor cortex) and occipital electrodes (visual cortex) were used to isolate the salient events within each gesture. We found that a linear model predicting mu peaks from motion inflections fits the data well. Increases in EEG power were detected 380 and 500ms after inflection points at occipital and central electrodes, respectively. These results suggest that coordinated activity in visual and motor cortices is sensitive to motion trajectories during gesture observation, and it is consistent with the proposal that inflection points operate as placeholders in gesture recognition.
This work has been submitted to a IEEE conference and is awaiting for a decision
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
