
Recently developed appearance descriptors offer the opportunity for efficient and robust facial expression recognition. In this paper we investigate the merits of the family of local binary pattern descriptors for FACS Action-Unit (AU) detection. We compare Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Local Phase Quantisation (LPQ) for static AU analysis. To encode facial expression dynamics, we extend the purely spatial representation LPQ to a dynamic texture descriptor which we call Local Phase Quantisation from Three Orthogonal Planes (LPQ-TOP), and compare this with the Local Binary Patterns from Three Orthogonal Planes (LBP-TOP). The efficiency of these descriptors is evaluated by a fully automatic AU detection system and tested on posed and spontaneous expression data collected from the MMI and SEMAINE databases. Results show that the systems based on LPQ achieve higher accuracy rate than those using LBP, and that the systems that utilise dynamic appearance descriptors outperform those that use static appearance descriptors. Overall, our proposed LPQ-TOP method outperformed all other tested methods.
Histograms, EWI-21329, IR-79434, HMI-MI: MULTIMODAL INTERACTIONS, Face Recognition, EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/211486, EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/231287, METIS-285030, Image sequences, Face, Feature extraction, Gold, Pixel
Histograms, EWI-21329, IR-79434, HMI-MI: MULTIMODAL INTERACTIONS, Face Recognition, EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/211486, EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/231287, METIS-285030, Image sequences, Face, Feature extraction, Gold, Pixel
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 165 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
