Views provided by UsageCounts
Robotic manipulation involves actions where contacts occur between the robot and the objects. In this scope, the availability of physics-based engines allows motion planners to comprise dynamics between rigid bodies, which is necessary for planning this type of actions. However, physics-based motion planning is computationally intensive due to the high dimensionality of the state space and the need to work with a low integration step to find accurate solutions. On the other hand, manipulation actions change the environment and conditions further actions and motions. To cope with this issue, the representation of manipulation actions using ontologies enables a semantic-based inference process that alleviates the computational cost of motion planning. This paper proposes a manipulation planning framework where physics-based motion planning is enhanced with ontological knowledge representation and reasoning. The proposal has been implemented and is illustrated and validated with a simple example. Its use in grasping tasks in cluttered environments is currently under development.
IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies Factory Automation (ETFA) 2015
Simulations, FOS: Computer and information sciences, :Física [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Física, Physics, :Enginyeria electrònica [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Física, Computer Science - Robotics, Physics-based motion planning, Knowledge-based reasoning, Manipulation, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria electrònica, Dynamic simulations, Robotics (cs.RO)
Simulations, FOS: Computer and information sciences, :Física [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Física, Physics, :Enginyeria electrònica [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Física, Computer Science - Robotics, Physics-based motion planning, Knowledge-based reasoning, Manipulation, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria electrònica, Dynamic simulations, Robotics (cs.RO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 35 |

Views provided by UsageCounts