
doi: 10.1109/ems.2008.74
In trying to mimic biological functions of the brain, artificial neural network (ANN) research has, out of computational necessity, made a number of assumptions. Firstly, it is assumed that the complexity of biological processes can be usefully replicated artificially by abstracting a relatively few key or essential characteristics from the biological system. Secondly, it is often assumed that a single entity, the neuron, is solely responsible for biological cognitive processing or computation. Thirdly, it is also often assumed that this processing is entirely dependant on microscopic factors within the neuron. Recent research using spiking neural networks (SNNs) has addressed the first assumption, highlighting that emphasizing alternative biological functionality may afford massive computational gain. In an attempt to address the last two assumptions, the authors propose that the glial network may be acting as a feature extraction network in a way that is similar to the function of a reservoir computer.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
