Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2...
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: IEEE Copyright
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ECG-based Random Forest Classifier for Cardiac Arrest Rhythms

Authors: Elisabete Aramendi; Iraia Isasi; Mikel Olabarria; Javier Del Ser; Carlos Corcuera; Andima Larrea; Unai Irusta; +2 Authors

ECG-based Random Forest Classifier for Cardiac Arrest Rhythms

Abstract

Rhythm annotation of out-of-hospital cardiac episodes (OHCA) is key for a better understanding of the interplay between resuscitation therapy and OHCA patient outcome. OHCA rhythms are classified in five categories, asystole (AS), pulseless electrical activity (PEA), pulsed rhythms (PR), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Manual OHCA annotation by expert clinicians is onerous and time consuming, so there is a need for accurate and automatic OHCA rhythm annotation methods. For this study 852 OHCA episodes of patients treated with Automated External Defibrillators (AED) by the Emergency Medical Services of the Basque Country were analyzed. Six expert clinicians reviewed the electrocardiogram (ECG) of 4214 AED rhythm analyses and annotated the rhythm. Their consensus decision was used as ground truth. There were a total of 2418 AS, 294 PR, 1008 PEA, 472 VF and 22 VT. The ECG analysis intervals were extracted and used to develop an automatic rhythm annotator. Data was partitioned patient-wise into training (70%) and test (30%). Performance was evaluated in terms of per class sensitivity (Se) and F-score (F1). The unweighted mean of sensitivity (UMS) and F-score were used as global performance metrics. The classification method is composed of a feature extraction and denoising stage based on the stationary wavelet transform of the ECG, and on a random forest classifier. The best model presented a per rhythm Se/F1 of 95.8/95.7, 43.3/52.2, 85.3/81.3, 94.2/96.1, 81.9/72.2 for AS, PR, PEA, VF and VT, respectively. The UMS for the test set was 80.2%, 2-points above that of previous solutions. This method could be used to retrospectively annotate large OHCA datasets and ameliorate the workload of manual OHCA rhythm annotation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Electrocardiography, Emergency Medical Services, Decision Trees, Ventricular Fibrillation, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Humans, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Heart Arrest, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?