Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A multi-criteria evaluation platform for segmentation algorithms

Authors: Pierre Laurent; Thierry Cresson; Carlos Vázquez 0001; Nicola Hagemeister; Jacques A. de Guise;

A multi-criteria evaluation platform for segmentation algorithms

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a platform for evaluating segmentation algorithms that detect anatomical structures in medical images. Structure detection being subject to human interpretation, we first describe a method to define a ground truth model, i.e. a generated bronze standard, that will be the reference for subsequent analysis. This bronze standard will be characterized in order to retrieve its confidence level that will later be used to normalize the algorithm evaluation. We then describe how the developed platform helps in evaluating algorithm performances described using five evaluation criteria: accuracy, reliability, robustness, under/over segmentation sensitivity and outlier sensitivity. First, we explain how to extract those evaluation criteria using specific normalized metrics commonly found in the literature, then we present how to combine all the information in order to get a global evaluation of segmentation algorithms. Lastly, a radar-style graph analysis is presented for easy multi-criteria interpretation.

Keywords

Diagnostic Imaging, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Algorithms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!