Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Volume effect on interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Ni(UBM)/Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Ni(UBM) joints

Authors: Jing-Bo Zeng; Guang-Sui Xu; Min-Bo Zhou; Xin-Ping Zhang;

Volume effect on interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Ni(UBM)/Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Ni(UBM) joints

Abstract

The effect of solder volume on the interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of micro-scale line-type Ni/Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Ni joints was investigated. Ni wires of 300 µm in diameter were used as under-bump-metallization (UBM) to be connected by Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu solder balls. The solder joints were assembled by modeling the thermal cycle of the reflow process with the accurately controlled assembly joint gap (i.e., joint thickness or height) of 100, 75, 50 and 25 µm, respectively. The mechanical behavior of the joints was evaluated by a dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) under uniaxial tensile loading. The interfacial microstructure and fractographic morphologies of the joints were analyzed by SEM equipped with EDS. Results show that both (Ni,Cu) 3 Sn 4 and (Cu,Ni) 6 Sn 5 IMC phases formed at the interface of all the as-assembled solder joints regardless of solder volume or joint thickness, i.e., the solder volume has little influence on the interfacial reaction products. Furthermore, with decreasing the joint thickness, tensile strength of the joints increases obviously. Fractographic morphology analysis results indicate that there are three different failure modes, that is, ductile, quasi-brittle and brittle mode. The joints with thicknesses of 100 and 75 µm all failed in a ductile failure mode, the joints with a thickness of 50 µm failed in both ductile and quasi-brittle mode, while for the joints with a very small thickness of 25 µm, brittle fracture happened and quasi-brittle failure mode still possessed the most part.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!