
In previous work we proposed that affect can be modeled in an autonomous agent. We report progress made since then—specifically, an improved understanding of the basis of our approach, a new version of the model used earlier, rationalized both in terms of the underlying neuroscience and the equations used to compute affect. We describe plans for future work to remove constants that we presently have hard coded into the model. We also report some of the difficulties we face: the need for a stronger empirical basis for the equations we use, and the difficulty in identifying success criteria.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
