
doi: 10.1109/dcc.2013.30
handle: 11577/2831509
We characterize ``visual textures'' as realizations of a stationary, ergodic, Markovian process, and propose using its approximate minimal sufficient statistics for compressing texture images. We propose inference algorithms for estimating the ``state'' of such process and its ``variability''. These represent the encoding stage. We also propose a non-parametric sampling scheme for decoding, by synthesizing textures from their encoding. While these are not faithful reproductions of the original textures (so they would fail a comparison test based on PSNR), they capture the statistical properties of the underlying process, as we demonstrate empirically. We also quantify the tradeoff between fidelity (measured by a proxy of a perceptual score) and complexity.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
