Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Deadzone Based Rate Allocation for JPEG XR

Authors: Thomas Richter 0005;

Deadzone Based Rate Allocation for JPEG XR

Abstract

Similar to the JPEG image compression standard, the JPEG XR image compression solely controls the image quality loss and hence the output rate by means of the quantizer bucket sizes, a precise rate control mechanism like the EBCOT rate allocation algorithm in JPEG 2000 is not specified, and hence rate-distortion optimality of the quantizer is, in general, not given. In this work, a simple rate-control mechanism for JPEG XR is introduced that allows an efficient control of the quantizer towards rate-distortion optimality. One possibility to implement this quantizer control would be to use the spatial variable quantization feature of JPEG XR, but it was seen in an earlier work that the additional side information required to transmit the quantization setting almost compensates the PSNR gain of variable quantization and complicates the rate allocation process by requiring an additional quantizer allocation step. However, while JPEG XR defines the image reconstruction process completely, an encoder still has the freedom to select the dead zone size of the quantizer, this mechanism has the additional advantage that no additional side information needs to be transmitted and that the dead zone size is not, unlike the quantizer bucket size, constrained to a set of pre-defined values specified in the standard. It is found that the image quality of JPEG XR can be improved by about 0.2 to 0.4 dB by performing a rate-distortion optimal selection of the dead zone, this gain is seen to be comparable to the PSNR loss of a JPEG 2000 codec where, for experimental reasons, EBCOT rate control has been turned off.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!