Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A memory-efficient adaptive Huffman coding algorithm for very large sets of symbols

Authors: Steven Pigeon; Yoshua Bengio;

A memory-efficient adaptive Huffman coding algorithm for very large sets of symbols

Abstract

Summary form only given. The problem of computing the minimum redundancy codes as we observe symbols one by one has received a lot of attention. However, existing algorithms implicitly assumes that either we have a small alphabet or that we have an arbitrary amount of memory at our disposal for the creation of a coding tree. In real life applications one may need to encode symbols coming from a much larger alphabet, for e.g. coding integers. We introduce a new algorithm for adaptive Huffman coding, called algorithm M, that uses space proportional to the number of frequency classes. The algorithm uses a tree with leaves that represent sets of symbols with the same frequency, rather than individual symbols. The code for each symbol is therefore composed of a prefix (specifying the set, or the leaf of the tree) and a suffix (specifying the symbol within the set of same-frequency symbols). The algorithm uses only two operations to remain as close as possible to the optimal: set migration and rebalancing. We analyze the computational complexity of algorithm M, and point to its advantages in terms of low memory complexity and fast decoding. Comparative experiments were performed with algorithm M on the Calgary corpus, with static Huffman coding as well as with another adaptive Huffman coding algorithms, algorithm /spl Lambda/ of Vitter. Experiments show that M performs comparably or better than the other algorithms but requires much less memory. Finally, we present an improved algorithm, M/sup +/, for non-stationary data, which models the distribution of the data in a fixed-size window in the data sequence.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!