
We propose a novel approach for American Sign Langauge (ASL) phrase verification that combines confidence measures (CM) obtained from aligning forward sign models (the conventional approach) to the input data with the CM's obtained from aligning reversed sign models to the same input. To demonstrate our approach we have used two CM's, the Normalized likelihood score and the Log-Likelihood Ratio (LLR).We perform leave-one-signer-out cross validation on a dataset of 420 ASL phrases obtained from five deaf children playing an educational game called CopyCat. The results show that for the new method the alignment selected for signs in a test phrase has a significantly better match to the ground truth when compared to the traditional approach. Additionally, when a low false reject rate is desired the new technique can provide a better verification accuracy as compared to the conventional approach.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
