
doi: 10.1109/cvpr.2005.70
Most camera calibration algorithms consider parameters that define the lens distortion mapping. The usual way to determine these parameters is to minimize a nonlinear optimization problem in the final step of a calibration algorithm. This neglects the fact that given the projection matrix and the calibration data the parameters of a radial distortion can be determined analytically. In this article we show that the problem can be solved in a closed form. We present an algorithm in which this is done and compare it to classic approaches.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
