
We formulate optical flow estimation as a two-stage regression problem. Based on characteristics of these two regression models and conclusions on modern regression methods, we choose a least trimmed squares followed by a weighted least squares estimator to solve the optical flow constraint (OFC); and at places where this one-stage robust method fails due to poor derivative quality, we use a least trimmed squares estimator to make the facet model fitting robust. This two-stage robust scheme produces significantly higher accuracy than non-robust algorithms and those only using robust methods at the OFC stage. On the synthetic data, the one-stage robust method has an average error of 7.7% against 24% of Black's and 19% of the pure LS method; and the two-stage robust method further reduces the error by half near motion boundaries. Advantages are also demonstrated on real data.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
