
The authors present two methods for very-high-precision estimation of straight-line parameters from the Hough transform and compare them with the standard method of taking the absolute peak in the Hough array and with least-squares fitting using both extensive simulation and a number of tests with real target images. Both methods use preprocessing and interpolation in the Hough array, and are based on compensating for effects that cause a spreading of the peak in Hough space. By interpolation, the authors achieve accuracy better than the accumulator cell size. A complete set of simulations show that the two methods produce similar results, which are much better than taking the absolute peak in Hough space. They also compare well with least-square fitting, which was considered optimal in the case of zero mean noise. Results of experiments with real images are reported, confirming that the Hough transform can yield very accurate results, almost as good as least-squares fitting for zero mean noise. >
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
