
doi: 10.1109/csfw.2005.26
A number of key establishment protocols claim the property of forward secrecy, where the compromise of a long-term key does not result in the compromise of previously computed session-keys. We describe how such protocols can be modelled using the process algebra CSP and explain why the well-known rank function approach is incapable of proving their correctness. This shortcoming motivates us to propose a generalised proof technique based on the novel concept of a temporal rank function. We apply this approach to two examples: a protocol due to Boyd and the Cliques (A-GDH.2) group key agreement protocol.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
