Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ethical responsibilities and legal liabilities of network security professionals

Authors: F. C. Smith;

Ethical responsibilities and legal liabilities of network security professionals

Abstract

Profits, losses and the attendant risks of tort litigation run to the extreme in times of great speculation in an unregulated economic environment-conditions which characterize the present enormous growth in computer networking. Public law enforcement has thus far been largely ineffectual in deterring or even detecting criminal abuses of network resources. At the same time, reliance primarily on technical solutions for preventing and redressing criminal and civil wrongs may prove to be more harmful to individual and group liberties than imaginative and ethical attempts to use the criminal and civil law traditions. The anticipated storm of civil litigation flowing from the Year 2000 (Y2K) crisis can be expected to create a critical mass in both the number of new computer literate lawyers and in their experimentation with and confidence in the use of tort law for computer security failures and other Y2K related litigation. Among the risks that prudent network security professionals need to be concerned with, as they plan to deal with the millennium bug, is the growing risk of legal liability for security failures. Computer security professionals have not yet had to answer to any moral or legal outcry for social redress of the lack of security in the networks, while the tradition of keeping secret the vulnerabilities of evolving computer network technology has only recently begun to be seriously questioned by the profession and others.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!