
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) is the short-range, single-hop protocol of choice for the edge of the IoT. Despite its growing significance for phone-to-peripheral communication, BLE's smartphone system performance characteristics are not well understood. As others, we experienced mixed erratic performance results in our BLE based smartphone-centric applications. In these applications, developers can only access low-level functionalities through multiple layers of OS and hardware abstractions. We propose an experimental framework for such systems, with which we perform experiments on a variety of modern smartphones. Our evaluation characterizes existing devices and gives new insight about peripheral parameters settings. We show that BLE performances vary significantly in non-trivial ways, depending on SoC and OS with a vast impact on applications.
IoT, BLE smartphone system performance characteristics, mixed erratic performance results, mobile computing, Internet of Things, Wireless communication, Benchmark, BLE performances, low-level functionalities, Smart phones, Hardware, Wireless fidelity, Evaluation, peripheral parameters settings, phone-to-peripheral communication, Benchmark testing, BLE based smartphone-centric applications, Bluetooth, Androids, smart phones, 004, hardware abstractions, Smartphones, modern smartphones, BLE, Bluetooth Low Energy
IoT, BLE smartphone system performance characteristics, mixed erratic performance results, mobile computing, Internet of Things, Wireless communication, Benchmark, BLE performances, low-level functionalities, Smart phones, Hardware, Wireless fidelity, Evaluation, peripheral parameters settings, phone-to-peripheral communication, Benchmark testing, BLE based smartphone-centric applications, Bluetooth, Androids, smart phones, 004, hardware abstractions, Smartphones, modern smartphones, BLE, Bluetooth Low Energy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
