
handle: 10679/2248
Model-based testing facilitates automatic generation of test cases by means of models of the system under test. Correctness and completeness of these models determine the effectiveness of the generated test cases. Critical faults can be missed due to omissions in the models, which are primarily created manually. In practice, these faults are usually detected with exploratory testing performed manually by experienced test engineers. In this paper, we propose an approach for refining system models based on the experience and domain knowledge of these test engineers. Our toolset analyzes the execution traces that are recorded during exploratory testing activities and identifies the omissions in system models. The identified omissions guide the refinement of models to be able to generate more effective test cases. We applied our approach in the context of an industrial case study to improve the models for model-based testing of a Digital TV system. After applying our approach, three critical faults were detected. These faults were not detected by the initial set of test cases and they were also missed during the exploratory testing activities.
Industrial case study, Model-based testing, Exploratory testing
Industrial case study, Model-based testing, Exploratory testing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
