
When a program fails to accomplish its intended task, debugging is conducted to identify and remove any bugs. The debugging operation itself is not immune to flaws. Empirical evidence suggests many bugs are found after shipping, which calls into question the effectiveness of the present debugging operation. When failing to accomplish its mission, the debugging operation itself needs to be debugged. Challenging the traditional view on debugging, this paper identifies misdirection and inadequacies of the present program debugging operation. To improve debugging, it critically reviews selected aspects of the debugging operation and the system development life cycle, and explores linkages connecting debugging to other environments (e.g. auditing, business, and education). Suggestions for improvement of debugging are made.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
