
Assurance is not a specific thing that can be easily measured and monitored. It is an emerging composition of a variety of independently collected data elements that come from loosely linked software life cycle activities. As a system emerges from concept to high-level design to architecture to detailed design to code to components to implementation there is a huge amount of information that is assembled in artifacts, text, and evaluation outputs. This paper proposes a framework for making sense of these pieces to monitor and manage assurance. An example is provided to show how the framework can be applied to evaluating tainted and counterfeit products.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
