
Classical unification is strict in the sense that it requires a perfect agreement between the terms being unified. In practise, data are seldom error-free and can contain incorrect information. Classical unification fails when the data are imperfect. Relaxed unification is a new formalism that relaxes the rigid constraints of classical unification and enables reasoning under uncertainty and in the presence of inconsistent data. We propose a probabilistic evaluation function to evaluate the degree of mismatches in relaxed terms and illustrate its use with an example.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
