
We discuss the prospects and perils of electronic voting technologies. We argue that poorly designed and deployed technology can be the source of major threats to the security of the voting process, although carefully designed systems have the potential to increase the trustworthiness. For a voting system to be generally accepted, however, it is essential that it be not only trustworthy but also trusted.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
