
For the last 26 years packet networks have insured low data loss for bursty data traffic with flow control which the author introduced in the ARPANET in 1969 and as a standard in X.25 in 1975. However, from the time ATM was introduced commercially around 1992 until now, flow control has been totally missing. The credit flow control used historically in packet networks was far too expensive at ATM speeds and no alternative had been developed. Without flow control, ATM has been no more effective than a high speed circuit switch. Over the past two years the ATM Forum has studied and refined the authors proposal for explicit rate flow control. This recommendation which will be released in early 1996 will finally permit ATM to carry data traffic with high efficiency and with extremely low loss. This paper examines the performance of various possible versions of rate flow control permissible under this recommendation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
