
Several researchers investigated the placing of communication calls in message-passing parallel codes. The current rule of thumb it to maximize communication/computation overlap with early binding. In this work, we demonstrate that this is not the only design constraint because CPU caches can have a significant impact on communications. We conduct an empirical study of the interaction between CPU caching and communications for several different communication scenarios. We use the gained insight to formulate a set of intuitive rules for communication call placement and show how our rules can be applied to practical codes. Our optimized codes show an improvement of up to 40% for a simple stencil code. Our work is a first step towards communication optimizations by moving communication calls. We expect that future communication-aware compilers will use our insights as a standard technique to move communication calls in order to optimize performance.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
