Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Bayesian optimization for parameter tuning in evolutionary algorithms

Authors: Ibai Roman; Josu Ceberio; Alexander Mendiburu; Jose A. Lozano;

Bayesian optimization for parameter tuning in evolutionary algorithms

Abstract

Advances in evolutionary computation have demonstrated that Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) proposed in this area are a solid alternative for solving combinatorial and continuous optimization problems. Despite their success in innumerable real-world scenarios, EAs depend on a set of input parameters that characterize their performance and need to be adjusted. In fact, identifying and setting the most appropriate parameters for an EA is a complex task, which, in some cases, can be as difficult as the optimization problem at hand. Recently, parameter tuning has attracted the interest of the research community, designing and proposing techniques that (1) help the algorithm to perform to its best, and (2), indirectly, make fairer comparisons of different methods. In this manuscript, we propose a novel offline parameter tuning algorithm based on Bayesian Optimization, a sequential design strategy for global optimization. In order to illustrate the validity of the proposed method, we considered as a case of study the Hybrid Kernel EDA, an EA that is characterized by 6 parameters. We ran the algorithm with the parameters tuned by means of Bayesian Optimization, and compared the results with those obtained by setting the parameters by hand (using some prior knowledge). Experiments were carried out on a benchmark of 60 instances of the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Experimental results show that, in general, Hybrid Kernel EDA obtains better results when using the parameters tuned by means of Bayesian Optimization.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!