Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Simulating chemical evolution

Authors: In Soo Oh; Yun-Geun Lee; Robert Ian (Bob) McKay;

Simulating chemical evolution

Abstract

Chemical methods such as directed evolution and some forms of the SELEX procedure implement evolutionary algorithms directly in vitro. They have a wide range of applications in detecting and targeting diseases and potential applications in other areas as well [1]. However it is relatively difficult and expensive to carry out these processes (by comparison with evolutionary computation), so that the underlying theory has seen limited development. For more complex problems, where multiple and dynamic objectives are involved, there is potential for substantial improvement in the search protocols. Simulation through the methods of evolutionary computation is one potential way to gain the necessary insights. The complex fitness functions and huge populations involved in combinatorial chemistry render detailed simulation infeasible. However detailed simulation is not needed, so long as simulations are sufficiently similar to yield qualitative insights. In this paper, we investigate whether one class of problems — those involving short-chain evolution, where stereochemical effects do not dominate — are likely to have sufficiently similar fitness landscapes to a simple problem, string matching, for useful inferences to be made. In the outcome, it appears that the differences between more detailed simulations and string matching are not sufficient to significantly alter the behaviour of evolutionary algorithms, so that string matching could be used as a realistic surrogate. This is valuable, because string matching can be implemented in GPUs, offering speed-ups to the level where populations of 107, or even 108, might be feasible, thus reducing the population gap between chemical and computer evolution.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!