
This paper investigates the feasibility of using Genetic Programming in dynamically changing environments to evolve decision trees for classification problems and proposes an new version of Genetic Programming called Adaptive Genetic Programming. It does so by comparing the performance or classification error of Genetic Programming and Adaptive Genetic Programming to that of Gradient Descent in abruptly and progressively changing environments. To cope with dynamic environments, Adaptive Genetic Programming incorporates adaptive control parameters, variable elitism and culling. Results show that both Genetic Programming and Adaptive Genetic Programming are viable algorithms for dynamic environments yielding a performance gain over Gradient Descent for lower dimensional problems even with severe environment changes. In addition, Adaptive Genetic Programming performs slightly better than Genetic Programming, due to faster recovery from changes in the environment.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
