Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.20...
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object . 2024
Data sources: DBLP
DBLP
Conference object . 2024
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization of Business Processes

Authors: Ashutosh Tiwari 0001; Kostas Vergidis; Chris J. Turner;

Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization of Business Processes

Abstract

Most of the current attempts for business process optimisation are manual without involving any formal automated methodology. This paper proposes a framework for multi-objective optimisation of business processes. The framework uses a generic business process model that is formally defined and specifies process cost and duration as objective functions. The business process model is programmed and incorporated into a software platform where a selection of multi-objective optimisation algorithms is applied to five test problems. The test problems are business process designs of varying complexities and are optimised with three popular optimisation techniques (NSGA2, SPEA2 and MOPSO algorithms). The results indicate that although the business process optimisation is a highly constrained problem with fragmented search space, multi-objective optimisation algorithms such as NSGA2 and SPEA2 produce a satisfactory number of alternative optimised business processes. However, the performance of the optimisation algorithms drops sharply with even a slight increase in problem complexity. This paper also discusses the directions for future research in this area.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!