
The effect of noise on the evolutionary dynamics of evolutionary programming (EP) is empirically observed using three different statistical values. These are: (1) the averaged best function values, (2) the average of the strategy parameters, and (3) Hotelling's T/sup 2/ of real values. The classical EP (CEP) of D.B. Fogel (1995), the fast EP (FEP) of X. Yao & Y. Liu (1996) and our extended, robust EP (REP) (Y. Matsumura, K. Ohkura & K. Ueda, 1999) are adopted for the observation. We show that REP performs more robustly than CEP and FEP for six noisy test functions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
