
Design of parallel binary decision fusion systems is often performed under the assumption that the decision integrator (the data fusion center, DFC) possesses perfect knowledge of the local-detector (LD) statistics. In most studies, other statistical parameters are also assumed to be known, namely the a priori probabilities of the hypotheses, and the transition probabilities of the DFC-LD channels. The local observations are assumed to be statistically independent (conditioned on the hypothesis). Under these circumstances, the DFC's sufficient statistic is a weighted sum of the local decisions and the weights depend on the statistical parameters. When these parameters are unknown, we propose to estimate them online, using the discriminant function of the DFC as the performance index. This process can be performed with the help of a teacher that supplies the correct labels of the data, or without supervision, by estimating the correct labels from the data. The label-estimates are generated by the DFC, on the basis of its own past decisions and its assessment of the LD-data reliability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
