
This paper compared two multi-document summarization systems we developed. One system used hierarchical sentence clustering algorithm to find the important information, while the other system mainly adopted hierarchical Latent Dirichlet Allocation (hLDA) topic model to obtain the sub-topics of multi-document data. Both of the two systems are evaluated and compared on TAC 2010/TAC 2011 data using the ROUGE testing method with same parameters' setting. The results have shown that the hLDA system has got some improvement compared with the clustering system. And normally in ROUGE testing, results from non-stopwords are better than those from stopwords.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
