
doi: 10.1109/ccc.2008.33
handle: 11245/1.300730 , 11104/0167919
In this paper we study the individual communication complexity of the following problem. Alice receives an input string x and Bob an input string y, and Alice has to output y. For deterministic protocols it has been shown in Buhrman et al. (2004), that C(y) many bits need to be exchanged even if the actual amount of information C(y|x) is much smaller than C(y). It turns out that for randomised protocols the situation is very different. We establish randomised protocols whose communication complexity is close to the information theoretical lower bound. We furthermore initiate and obtain results about the randomised round complexity of this problem and show trade-offs between the amount of communication and the number of rounds. In order to do this we establish a general framework for studying these types of questions.
individual communication complexity, randomized individual communication complexity, Kolmogorov complexity, round complexity, randomized protocols, rounds, 004
individual communication complexity, randomized individual communication complexity, Kolmogorov complexity, round complexity, randomized protocols, rounds, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
