
handle: 11573/1084780
Policy making has the strict requirement to rely on quantitative and high quality information. This paper will address the data quality issue for policy making by showing how to deal with Big Data quality in the different steps of a processing pipeline, with a focus on the integration of Big Data sources with traditional sources. In this respect, a relevant role is played by metadata and in particular by ontologies. Integration systems relying on ontologies enable indeed a formal quality evaluation of inaccuracy, inconsistency and incompleteness of integrated data. The paper will finally describe data confidentiality as a Big Data quality dimension, showing the main issues to be faced for its assurance.
Big Data;data integrity;meta data;ontologies (artificial intelligence);Big Data quality dimension;Big Data sources;data confidentiality;data quality issue;formal quality evaluation;high quality information;integrated data;integration systems;ontologies;policy making;processing pipeline;quantitative quality information;strict requirement;Big Data;Google;Metadata;Ontologies;Pipelines;Big Data confidentiality;Big Data pipeline;Quality-driven policies;ontology-based quality checking;cybersercurity
Big Data;data integrity;meta data;ontologies (artificial intelligence);Big Data quality dimension;Big Data sources;data confidentiality;data quality issue;formal quality evaluation;high quality information;integrated data;integration systems;ontologies;policy making;processing pipeline;quantitative quality information;strict requirement;Big Data;Google;Metadata;Ontologies;Pipelines;Big Data confidentiality;Big Data pipeline;Quality-driven policies;ontology-based quality checking;cybersercurity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
