
There is great interest in using commodity cluster computers to process large graphs, but there is limited research in this area. Graph Twiddling in MapReduce [5] describes a pattern for graph processing using a series of sort and shuffle MapReduce operations. Graphs are iteratively read, processed, and written to the distributed file system. Storing the graph in a Big table-inspired database can provide performance benefits. However, some databases offer alternative processing opportunities that can assist processing. Accumulo for example implements queries as a scan using distributed iterator trees. An iterator can filter, produce a metric, or aggregate rows. MapReduce used in combination with Accumulo uses multiple scanners, each processing a range of an Accumulo table. Instead, we propose to use iterators in place of MapReduce. We show that Accumulo iterators can be used as an effective replacement for MapReduce, while providing substantial performance gains. We describe our approach demonstrating where performance improvements are achieved, and discuss drawbacks of the approach.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
