Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The caustic fields of offset ellipsoidal reflectors: a comparative study

Authors: P.O. Iversen; Y. Rahmat-Samii;

The caustic fields of offset ellipsoidal reflectors: a comparative study

Abstract

The conditions under which the GTD (geometrical theory of diffraction) and Gaussian beam solutions are able to specify the phase and magnitude of the fields around the caustics of offset ellipsoidal reflectors are examined. This is done through the comparison of these methods with the near-field physical optics solution (PO). It is shown that the Gaussian beam results are relatively accurate down to a reflector diameter of the order of 30 lambda , provided that the feed edge taper is at least of the order of 25 dB. As the size of the reflector gets smaller, the maximum field strength predicted by PO becomes lower than that predicted by the Gaussian beam solution. Further, the location of the maximum field strength moves closer to the reflector. The phase at the focal point remains accurate even though the magnitude at the focal point is in error. The GTD solution remains accurate for the magnitude of the fields for distances greater than about 10 lambda from the focus. However, the phase of the fields is in error until a distance of about 30 lambda from the focal point. The results are discussed in connection with high-power microwave applications. >

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!