
Recently, M. Sekhar gave a digital signature scheme with message recovery, where only a specific verifier can directly check the validity of the signature. A third party can distinguish a valid signature through a zero-knowledge proof protocol. However we find that the proposed scheme is in-secure. A forgery attack strategy on M. Sekhar's scheme has been designed; anyone who has a valid signature can forge a signature on an arbitrary message. An improved signature scheme, which can resist the forgery attack and a zero-knowledge proof protocol with which a third party can distinguish a valid signature are presented. Also,the security of the improved scheme is analyzed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
