
arXiv: 1805.03090
In this paper, we consider an adversarial scenario where one agent seeks to achieve an objective and its adversary seeks to learn the agent's intentions and prevent the agent from achieving its objective. The agent has an incentive to try to deceive the adversary about its intentions, while at the same time working to achieve its objective. The primary contribution of this paper is to introduce a mathematically rigorous framework for the notion of deception within the context of optimal control. The central notion introduced in the paper is that of a belief-induced reward: a reward dependent not only on the agent's state and action, but also adversary's beliefs. Design of an optimal deceptive strategy then becomes a question of optimal control design on the product of the agent's state space and the adversary's belief space. The proposed framework allows for deception to be defined in an arbitrary control system endowed with a reward function, as well as with additional specifications limiting the agent's control policy. In addition to defining deception, we discuss design of optimally deceptive strategies under uncertainties in agent's knowledge about the adversary's learning process. In the latter part of the paper, we focus on a setting where the agent's behavior is governed by a Markov decision process, and show that the design of optimally deceptive strategies under lack of knowledge about the adversary naturally reduces to previously discussed problems in control design on partially observable or uncertain Markov decision processes. Finally, we present two examples of deceptive strategies: a "cops and robbers" scenario and an example where an agent may use camouflage while moving. We show that optimally deceptive strategies in such examples follow the intuitive idea of how to deceive an adversary in the above settings.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, 93C25, 93C41, 49N90, I.2.8, I.2.9, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Optimization and Control (math.OC), FOS: Mathematics, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, I.2.8; I.2.9, Mathematics - Optimization and Control
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, 93C25, 93C41, 49N90, I.2.8, I.2.9, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Optimization and Control (math.OC), FOS: Mathematics, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, I.2.8; I.2.9, Mathematics - Optimization and Control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
