Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://www.code.ucsd...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.1109/allert...
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Network coding for computing

Authors: Rathinakumar Appuswamy; Massimo Franceschetti; Nikhil Karamchandani; Kenneth Zeger;

Network coding for computing

Abstract

The following network computation problem is considered. A set of source nodes in an acyclic network generates independent messages and a single receiver node computes a function f of the messages. The objective is to characterize the maximum number of times f can be computed per network usage. The network coding problem for a single receiver network is a special case of the network computation problem (taking f to be the identity map) in which all of the source messages must be reproduced at the receiver. For network coding with a single receiver, routing is known to be rate-optimal and achieves the network min-cut upper bound. We give a generalized min-cut upper bound for the network computation problem. We show that the bound reduces to the usual network min-cut when f is the identity and the bound is tight for the computation of ldquodivisible functionsrdquo over ldquotree networksrdquo. We also show that the bound is not tight in general.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%