
The field of quantum technologies has garnered considerable interest and witnessed noteworthy progress in recent years. It is also anticipated that these technologies will continue to flourish and exert a considerable influence on society, i.e., a plethora of real-world problems that cannot be solved by classical algorithms are believed to benefit from the implementation of quantum algorithms. Meanwhile, as an alternative to cryptographic methods, physical layer security (PLS) has been extensively studied as a means to realize secure wireless communication that is resistant to attacks by both classical and quantum computers, i.e., quantum-safe. While the prevailing approach to PLS has been based on classical algorithms, this could potentially be accelerated by the application of quantum algorithms. This paper examines the potential applications of various quantum algorithms, including quantum annealing, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, and Grover-based algorithms, to the the PLS problems. In particular, we begin with a concise overview of their applications to physical layer techniques and then proceed to discuss their use in addressing the challenges of secret message transmission and secret key generation from wireless channels.
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), quantum annealing (QA), multi-input multi-output (MIMO), physical layer security (PLS), Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, quantum algorithms, TK1-9971
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), quantum annealing (QA), multi-input multi-output (MIMO), physical layer security (PLS), Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, quantum algorithms, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
