
handle: 10481/93846
We analyze the connection between two perspectives when defining fuzzy sets: the viewpoint of mappings and the viewpoint of families of level cuts. This analysis is mathematically supported by the framework of a categorical adjunction, which serves as a dictionary between these two perspectives. We prove that hesitant fuzzy sets and gradual sets are strongly related through this connection. This allows concepts and operations to be transferred from one class to the other, and vice versa. Concretely, as an application, we provide lattice operations on gradual sets, compatible with Zadeh’s max-min operations on fuzzy sets, when considering them as families of level cuts. We discuss the well-known representation theorem for fuzzy sets within this framework, and we show that the representation of fuzzy sets as gradual sets depends on the chosen embedding of fuzzy sets as hesitant fuzzy sets. Hence, distinct embeddings yield diverse representations of fuzzy sets as collections of subsets. Furthermore, we extend this methodology to include other classes of extended fuzzy sets. As a consequence, a representation theorem for interval-valued fuzzy sets is provided.
Programa Operativo FEDER 2014-2020 and Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad de la Junta de Andalucía, Spain, under Grant A-FQM-394-UGR20
‘‘María de Maeztu’’ Excellence Unit IMAG, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, under Grant CEX2020-001105-M
Gradual sets, Hesitant fuzzy sets, interval-valued fuzzy sets, representation theorems, Fuzzy sets, level cuts, gradual sets, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, hesitant fuzzy sets, TK1-9971
Gradual sets, Hesitant fuzzy sets, interval-valued fuzzy sets, representation theorems, Fuzzy sets, level cuts, gradual sets, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, hesitant fuzzy sets, TK1-9971
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
