
This survey paper compiles and benchmarks the performance of integrated magnetic sensors, in terms of their noise and full-scale magnetic field. In total, we collected performance metrics of 31 sensors realized in various technologies. For each sensor, we derived a noise model to estimate the noise under the same conditions. We obtained a comprehensive benchmark with a focus on integrated devices. We also measured the noise spectrum of 11 of those sensors to confirm our noise model. Given that for many emerging applications, such as tactile, current, torque and biomagnetic sensing, the signal of interest is the field gradient to reject magnetic stray fields, we extended the benchmark to gradiometers. We developed a low-noise measurement setup and a low-field gradient (full scale: $10 ~\mu \text{T}$ /mm) generation setup to characterize magnetic gradiometers in this regime. The paper discusses the key sensor trade-off between precision and range, and summarizes the technology trends graphically on a trade-off curve, providing broad insight.
gradiometers, Magnetic sensors, magnetometers, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TK1-9971
gradiometers, Magnetic sensors, magnetometers, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
