
Linguistic term sets combining with different types of fuzzy sets to settle decision making problems have been a hot area of decision making research. Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (LPFSs) and soft sets have strong ability to model uncertainty of decision-making. However, there are still few studies about LPFSs at present and these studies have some deficiencies. Aiming at these problems, we do the following things. Firstly, we give the definition of linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy soft sets (LPFSSs), redefine the entropy for LPFSs and introduce a novel linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy entropy which is more simple and valid. Then we give another way to represent linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (LPFNs) which can better reflect the characteristics of LPFSs. Based on that, we give the definition of distance measures for LPFSs and propose a series of distance measures for LPFNs and LPFSs. Finally, we improve the TOPSIS method with the proposed entropy and distance measure under LPFSSs environment and then apply the method in two cases. Compared with other methods, it's shown that our method has better distinguishability in evaluation results and can deal with group decision-making problems under LPFSSs environment.
Soft sets, distance measure, Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, multiple attribute decision making, entropy, TK1-9971
Soft sets, distance measure, Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, multiple attribute decision making, entropy, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
